FRIDAY, DECEMBER 13, 2024

For over two years, the industry has watched happenings at Vista Outdoors. Initially, Vista set out to break itself into two separate companies. The goal was to unlock value in the non-gun portions of the massive Vista portfolio. The initial plan would split the company into two publicly traded companies: Revelyst, the non-gun companies, and The Kinetic Group, the ammunition business that encompassed CCI, Federal, Remington, Hevi-Shot and Speer.

That process changed as private groups made overtures to acquire The Kinetic Group. And from that point, the acquisition game was on. Over the past two years, offers and counter-offers from suitors flew. Two weeks ago, Czech Sport Group (CSG) closed the deal for The Kinetic Group, adding it to their portfolio of international holdings.

This week, QA Outdoors’ Jim Shepherd talked with The Kinetic Group’s Chairman and CEO, Jason Vanderbrink, about the arduous process, what the new ownership will mean to customers and what’s ahead for the companies now under CSG ownership.

QA Outdoors
Jason, a long process to get the Vista separation the kinetic group sale the CSG transactions all done. Take a little bit of climate Phyllis in on how all this happened. 

Jason Vanderbrink
Yeah, so on May 5, 2022, which is over 900 days from November 27 of this year when we closed the transaction we we announced that we were gonna split up Vista Outdoor and two separate, but publicly traded,companies. We would have Revelyst and The Kinetic Group, both listed on the New York Stock Exchange. It made sense to do that because the valuation that Wall Street gives to ammunition companies. We were undervalued on the outdoor product side. As long as a majority of your revenue was tied to guns or ammo, it hurt the value of Revelyst. So to unlock the value of Revelyst to our shareholders, we had to separate it from the ammunition business, That was a great strategy, but as we started down that road, we had a lot of interest in private companies buying The Kinetic Group. It’s been played out in the public arena, unfortunately, for the last couple of years. We had multiple bidders trying to buy The Kinetic Group, which was great for shareholders.

So fast-forwarding to a couple weeks ago, we closed the CST transaction and and the shareholders made out well. The company made out well, because we're now in private hands, which has a lot of advantages to it, especially in our industry. We found a great home for our brands, a great home for employees and our four factories in the United States.

QA Outdoors 
Let me see: CCI, Federal, Remington, Hevi-Shot and Speer are the brands What do you say to people who are concerned that a Czech group now owns those companies? 

Jason Vanderbrink
I read all of the public reports. I understand all of the concerns, but I say to everyone: you may not like it, or doubt it, but the Czech owners with Michael Strnad and the team are fantastic owners.

I understand it's not American owned anymore, but at the same time, if you look at the firearms industry, there are a plethora of firearms manufacturers that are foreign but have US manufacturing bases. Our customers, our consumers, have nothing to worry about. While Kinetic is still foreign owned, I'm Chairman of Board for The Kinetic Group, still CEO. We still have the same management team. There’s no manufacturing leaving the United States -it’s actually quite the opposite. We will further invest in the United States now that we're in private hands. That’s what we should all be focusing on, because it’s going to lead to a lot of opportunities we wouldn’t have. Being privately held unlocked a lot of value that wouldn’t be there in the public markets.

QA Outdoors
I have talked to the Czech Sport Group I was told there's only one logical place in the world if you want to grow your business and where there’s a permissible climate: the United States. That’s why it makes sense for these companies to be bringing their investment money this way, doesn’t it?

Jason Vanderbrink
They wanted access to the US commercial market. What better way to have access to that market than to purchase The Kinetic Group. The ironic thing about this transaction is that people are thinking we're gonna ship manufacturing jobs or products overseas. It's literally the opposite of that. It's bringing money into the United States to expand US operations while also gaining a market where they don't they don't play a major role. I understand all of the emotion and concern. It’s good questions, and a great debate to have, but when you get to the reality of it, CSG’s not gonna spend over $2 billion and buy a company to hurt the business. It’s actually quite the opposite.

QA Outdoors
It probably bears mentioning the fact there's already company here Fiocchi - and CSG’s expanding their facilities here. A new primer making facility. It’s not like CSG’s looking to minimize its presence in the United States.

Jason Vanderbrink
Exactly. 

QA Outdoors
Let's talk about your customers. What is a retail customer going to see different under the ownership change?

Jason Vanderbrink
Absolutely nothing. They’ll see the sales the same salesforce calling on them. That will be the exact same. It will be literally invisible to our retail customers and to the consumers. 

QA Outdoors
What about to the employees? I'm sure they have concerns. 

Jason Vanderbrink
They have seen a long drawn out process. Like I said earlier, it’s unfortunate it was such a public debate. But employees have nothing to worry about. I’ve reassured them every time I go to the factories. I talk to them personally. What this does is give us exposure into some markets and customers where we don’t play. For our four factories in the United States really good, because it should get more business for us.

QA Outdoors
Let's talk about CSG. They make a lot of ammunition, but it's a little heavier caliber than most of us are dealing with. But they have expertise and the ability to bring economies of scale to you guys. Raw materials are always a concern, right?

Jason Vanderbrink
It's week two into it, but it could. For the most part, you know, they’re large artillery builders. So you know, we should reap some benefits as a company, as it will open up some broader markets we don’t services today. But we will still be a small caliber business.

QA Outdoors
From the industry side, this has -finally- resolved itself. I think a lot of people were watching from the sidelines wondering “What’s going to happen next?”

All this happened is it's finally resolved itself. I think a lot of people were ... 

Jason Vanderbrink
It took such a public public debate. I tell everyone next to the US steel divestiture, I think we ran the headlines this year. Now, I think everyone's relieved. I know we're relieved, the employees are relieved, and we have a good home. We have a great ownership group and it's gonna lead to great things. I know it will. 

QA Outdoors
It’s a very public debate when a vice-presidential candidate feels the need to weigh in on the issue.

Jason Vanderbrink
Yeah, yeah 

QA Outdoors
You said the consumer would see no difference. Let's talk about ownership and philosophy changes. I know you're still there. You were very involved in Vista. Vista had drawn lot of criticism from our side of the industry for being for lack of a better term very “Touchy-feely” and politically correct, especially when it came to DEI and all the associated stuff. Does that come over with you guys -because you’re essentially the same people. Will the DEI and minority focus and anti-slave trade and all the other “stuff” come over from the previous ownership?

Jason Vanderbrink
No, you know a public company has a multitude of challenges. A multitude of them Wall Street investors, and analysts. There are just certain things you have to do in a public company. But I can assure you that there’s not a company that’s ever done more for the Second Amendment. We have, and that will be apparent.  Sometimes you may wanna go more public with that; lean into it a little heavier. But, there's not a company that pays more in federal excise taxes than we do, or does more for conservation; does more for military law-enforcement, and that will not go backwards, one bit. A tremendous amount of our workforce are veterans. I think you can look at some of the things that we do. We never did them for publicity reasons. 

The public has no idea about our support for local law enforcement or supporting local police foundations, Purple Heart recipients, Medal of Honor recipients. We never did it for publicity reasons.. We never went public, but there’s not another company in the industry more committed to the Second Amendment, and that will never change.

QA Outdoors
I think it bears mentioning that under the Vista umbrella, you were affiliated with snowboards and skateboard and sunglasses and all of those things in areas of the outdoors that are not exactly aligned with the values of shooting sports.

Jason Vanderbrink
Yeah, but the business ran on its own. The brand groups ran on their own.The other side of the business never came in and asked us, or told us where to spend money, or who to support —none of that stuff.  The board directors, at the end of the day, let the businesses run. 

While Vista was a major company and a great company to work for, ultimately on The Kinetic Side, all of the business decisions started and stopped with me. Sometimes, that’s lost in translation.

QA Outdoors
As you said, public companies have other problems. You don't want to “the Little Sisters of Eternal Misery” forcing management to write term papers. That’s happened to other companies because of advocacy shareholders.

Jason Vanderbrink
That's right. 

QA Outdoors
This frees you up in a lot of ways, operationally, right? I don’t want to say “looser” because that’s not a standard we eve want to use. But this enables you to do things you could not do under a public umbrella, right? 

Jason Vanderbrink
Yeah. There are certain things that that we couldn’t do. You know, we may wanted, for instance, to have gotten more aggressive on some marketing campaigns or go do some stuff. But at the same time, you still have to run a business built on ethics and integrity. So I mean, yes, to answer your question directly. But at the same time, you’re still going to have some of that kind of stuff, you just won’t have all the public filings.

QA Outdoors
As we look down the road, what do you see in the next 18, next 24 months for Kinetic?

Jason Vanderbrink
I see the innovation pipeline. You will see here at SHOT Show that the innovation pipeline is as robust as it’s ever been. We’re gonna launch a product at the SHOT Show that is probably the biggest product that we will have launched in in our history. 

So you will see game-changing technology. We have a continued sense of urgency: how do we take more market share, become more innovative, but never lose focus that we have to be a consumer-centricorganization. Whatever the consumer wants is what we have to give them. We’ll continue to do that as best we can, and as fast as we can.

QA Outdoors
Probably a good point at which to stop. Don’t want to look too-far down the road.

Thank you, Jason. 

 
Outdoor Wire - 155 Litchfield Rd., Edgartown, MA 02539
Copyright © 2023, OWDN, All Rights Reserved.